Link to paper

The full paper is available here.

You can also find the paper on PapersWithCode here.

Abstract

Japanese CCGBank is used to develop Japanese CCG parsers
Linguistic validity of Japanese CCGBank needs to be verified
This paper focuses on analysis of passive/causative constructions in Japanese CCGBank
Together with ccg2lambda, Japanese CCGBank yields wrong predictions for nested passives and causatives

Process of generating wide-coverage syntactic parsers from treebanks established in 1990s
Belief at the time that formal syntactic theories too inflexible to describe real texts
Theoretical development of formal grammars and emergence of linguistically-oriented treebanks dispelled misconception
Combinatory Categorial Grammar (CCG) and CCGbank gave rise to CCG parsers
Research on Japanese syntax and parsers impacted by CCG
Japanese CCGbank generated from Kyoto Corpus by automatic conversion
Syntactic structures of CCG have more elaborated information than CFG
CCGBank serves as training and evaluation data for CCG parsers
Research from perspective of formal syntax conducted regarding adequacy of syntactic structures in treebanks
This paper assesses syntactic structures exhibited by Japanese CCGbank from viewpoint of theoretical linguistics

Japanese passives and causatives are described in a standard Japanese CCG
Ga-marked noun phrases in passive sentences correspond to nimarked or omarked noun phrases in active sentences
Syntactic structure of left-side sentences of (1) and (2) are shown in Figure 1
Semantic representations of words are defined using event semantics
Passive and causative suffixes know the argument structure of its first argument
N P ga corresponds to N P o or N P ni in passive constructions and N P ni|o corresponds to N P ga in causative constructions
Validity of analysis can be verified by inference data on various constructions including passives and causatives

Analysis of Japanese CCGBank relies on two CCG parsers
Lexical assignments for left-side sentences of (1) and (2) are shown in Figure 2
Semantic representation of two-place predicate homera is given
Relations between Agent and Theme are relativized by higher-order variables
Semantic representation of right-side of (1) is a standard neo-Davidsonian representation
Semantic representation of hasira-se is obtained using a semantic template
Semantic representation of hasira-sera-re is obtained by applying (13) to (17)
Error occurs because passive suffix assumes first argument is given Theme and second argument is given Agent

Syntactic analysis of Japanese CCGBank produces false predictions for passive and causative nesting
Standard analysis correctly explains all inferences
Burden of proof is on CCGBank side
Need for outreach to linguistic community to keep treebanks and parsers sound